No lessons from revolts for suppresors & corrupt, again plans to invade Syria, Iran, Korea or wherever its crony breeds are under threat?

They did it earlier attacking Vietnam, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, etc.. like our populist leaders do here on regular basis with so called terrorists, separatists, naxalists, maoists, activists, few remaining honest bureaucrats and now a new term added satyagrahists with BIG Indian Entertainers trying to trivialize the cause of eradicating corruption by promoting their own glamorous versions of "Satyagraha" for BOX office earnings, public sympathy and pleasing the BIG political masters. What Satyagraha A or B? It will be no surprise if India's bhaktoists support such wars, passively or actively.

Corrupt groups in US, Israeli and West have opposing ideas compared with Uprising Hindus, Communists, Arabs, Muslims, and most importantly the suffering neutral lot. Many awful news were overlooked in the midst of unavoidable revolutions out of long suppressions, causalities are mostly common soldiers or citizens - neither #paidmedia or the right-wing nationalistic cronies. Afghan government Bank was near collapse as the owners - who include some President's kins and other assorted political cronies - had among other nefarious activities taken the banks assets and speculated in real estate which promptly crashed. If the bank fails the government won't be able to pay its workers including the army. Millions in international aid may be washed away. <b>Even official democracies like India has witnessed billions of public money looted via dozens of scams and corrupt practices since it's independence by a small group of powerful cronies and their smart allies.</b>

After Tunisia, Egypt had witnessed extraordinary events including some violence between pro-and anti-Hosni Mubarak supporters and Army. Under pressure the Presidents agreed to quit office. A defiant Mubarak went on television to announce that he would not contest the presidential election but would not step down immediately (read do some politics with opposition!) an offer which failed to calm public fury as clashes erupted between his supporters and opponents in major cities. But are the real culprits suffering or using the revolt to plan stronger comebacks via proxies!

How on earth do we get saddled with such creepy clients as Karzai and Hosni Mubarak over and over again? <span class="pullquote">In large part its a vestige of the Cold War when all the world was a potential theater in the struggle against communism, why untested left communism is a threat no ones knows barring a few white and grey right-wing capitalists?</span> Afghanistan was certainly one; the Soviet departure created a vacuum and extreme Islamic ideas like Taliban rushed in.. which will continue further in times to come as side-affects of humans deeds today! Some west effort to transfer Egypt from the Soviet account to the American side in the 1970s, later perfected by Jimmy Carter was certainly another.

The truth is both strict realism and idealism have failed West overseas. Too often realism is just a rationale for maintaining the autocratic status quo which never lasts especially when presided over by terminal narcissists like Mubarak and Karzai. Too often idealism assumes democracy can be plopped into a culture without a middle class or a history of free institutions. In India's case, things are worse even with such things existing in abundance since time immemorial.

A smarter foreign policy would quietly promote a careful transition from autocracy to something more benign. The best way to do this is to latch onto institutions not individual leaders in the developing countries we seek as allies. Sadly the most reliable institution to latch onto — to train equip and support — is often the army. Humanitarian aid is nice but difficult to dispense and too often corrupted. Military aid comes with strings that bind - the continuing need for spare parts for example. But strong armies create security a necessary precursor for democracy.

It is not a sure thing of course; armies have provided a steady global diet of horrific dictators. In some cases like Pakistan or Burma, military assistance helps create greater regional tension and profits the weapons dealers in west. But when lucky abroad as in Turkey the military midwifes transition to some democracy. That will be true in mid-east as well - and perhaps even in Afghanistan and few other democratic and non-democratic nations with sick business & political leaders - if the World is lucky. But what if a terrorist is replaced with a corruption bhaktoist? Are we really better-off? Who comes out victorious from a revolution? Can the corrupt right-wing bhakts be paralyzed via social change or they keep terrorizing citizens with more inflation, more devaluation, more bribes, more taxes, more hypes, more rapes, more loot..? Watch-out!

news category

The US agency that brought you Internet is testing self-guided bullets capable of locking onto any moving enemy, safe kill from a mile away