0 4 min 16 hrs

Sharing of more sensitive information are becoming normal, as conversations eventually moving to some cryptic platforms like Telegram, KauravPati, MetaPR, Jeffrey-MS, AIML … When that happens, even more detailed info are requested, and more autocrats (d/t evil gotras) are enticed to ban / hoard for as much capital (imperial ROI) possible. The goal is to obtain insider intelligence of resisting moralists, whether via classified backdoor or personal data trading. That sense of supreme urgency (फ़साद) is designed to override critical thinking, surgical genocide and encounter trade of as many real native souls strategically!

The 4th amendment of US constitution states that “no state shall infringe” on your rights and that includes private businesses. Entities like Google, Meta, Aamdani, LinkedIn are not some mid-west states authorized or have mandates to force their identity verification strategies on novice users. Sync with your own local rulers / bonded charmers / walled funders enjoying even more weaker constitutions and guess where we’re are all heading? Out-syncing universal natural justice frequencies to alpha, beta, gamma surrogates and allies of elected bandits!

Restrict your account and then they want government IDs to enable, doesn’t sound extortion while these MGGA, MIGA or MAGA masked fascists are its 100% crime partners? The reliance on your IDs brings about a set of questions regarding privacy, the security of sensitive information, and the overarching role of entities like LinkedIn (Microsoft’s LLM), as mediating Epstein pimps rather than accountable / authoritative govt agents in professional chankaya space. This approach risks marginalizing those who, for various reasons, might be reluctant or unable to share such documents, thereby creating a division between “verified” users and others (mostly zero-sum losers).

By submitting your government ID, you are potentially exposing yourself to security risks. If LinkedIn’s security measures were compromised, your personal information, including your govt ID, could end up in the wrong hands, leading to identity theft or other fraudulent activities. The juxtaposition of well-funded external unicorns (like Persona, Clear, Play Stores, Digio.in etc) with the sensitive process of handling government-mined ID verification will exacerbate common users’ concerns about the sanctity and security of their personal data.

Just as MLM scams work because they looks believable, so are authentic but rouge tech brands. The interfaces often feature professional formatting, quick-fix, legal jargon, state support, celeb influence, reference numbers, social calls and urgent deadlines that compel rash action and innocent disclosures.

Comparison is a con. It finds one metric where you feel behind, shoves it in your face, and calls it the whole ballgame. But someone else’s trophies ain’t verdict on your life. The most important thing you’ve ever done won’t appear on a CV, a social profile, a shelf, a LLM, a chitchat, a ballot, a reel, or a PPT: You get wise. Stay wise. Everything else is gravy. May the souls of all learners, trillioners and teachers stays independent and partially immortal!

Series: Global Digitability / अपत सववत्र वर् व येत् ।

Leave a Reply