Sharing of more sensitive information are becoming normal, as conversations eventually moving to some cryptic platforms like Goo-gram, KauravPati, MetaPR, Jeffrey-MS, AIML, … When that happens, even more detailed info are requested, and more autocrats (d/t evil gotras) are enticed to ban / hoard for as much capital (imperial ROI) possible. The goal is to obtain insider intelligence of resisting moralists, whether via classified backdoor or personal data trading. That sense of supreme urgency (फ़साद) is designed to override critical thinking, surgical genocide and encounter trade of as many real native souls strategically!

The 4th amendment of US constitution states that “no state shall infringe” on your rights and that includes system supported private businesses and other parties. Entities like Google, X, Meta, AI Bots, Aamdani, MS LinkedIn are not some mid-west states authorized or have legal or moral mandates to force their identity verification and surveillance strategies on novice users in general public. Sync with your own local rulers / bureaucratic lobbyists / bonded charmers / walled funders enjoying even more weaker constitutions and guess where we’re are all heading? Out-syncing universal natural justice frequencies to alpha, beta, gamma surrogates and allies of elected(?) bandits!

Restrict or strike-off your identity and then they want some fancy digital IDs to enable whenever the Führer orders, doesn’t sound extortion while these MGGA, MIGA or MAGA masked fascist governments are its 100% crime partners? The reliance on your IDs brings about a set of questions regarding privacy, the security of sensitive information, and the overarching role of aggregators like LinkedIn (Microsoft’s LLM), as mediating Epstein pimps rather than accountable / authoritative govt agents in professional chanakya (चाणक्य) space. This approach risks marginalizing those who, for various reasons, might be reluctant or resist or unable to share such documents, thereby creating a division between “verified” users’ cult and other entities (mostly zero-sum losers).

By uploading personal info like government IDs on these demanding smart clouds / apps, you are potentially exposing yourself to security risks, as official public accountability are now mostly opaque games with backdoor jugaad. If LinkedIn’s security measures were compromised, your personal information, including your govt ID, could end up in the wrong hands, leading to identity theft or other fraudulent activities. The juxtaposition of well-funded external unicorns (like Persona, Clear, Play Stores, LLM Bots, Digio.in etc) with the sensitive process of handling mobile-mined ID verification will exacerbate common users’ concerns about the sanctity / security of their personal data and even lifestyles.

Just as, be rich MLM scams work because they looks believable, so are authentic but rouge tech brands. The interfaces often feature professional formatting, quick-fix, legal jargon, state support, celeb influence, reference numbers, social calls and urgent deadlines that compel rash action and innocent disclosures.

Comparison is a con. It finds one metric where you feel behind, shoves it in your face, and calls it the whole ballgame. But someone else’s trophies ain’t verdict on your life. The most important thing you’ve ever done won’t appear on a CV, a social profile, a shelf, a LLM, an advert, a chitchat, a ballot, a reel, or a PPT: You get wise. Stay wise. Everything else is gravy. May the souls of all learners, trillioners and teachers stays independent and partially immortal!

Series: Global Digitability / अति सर्वत्र वर्जयेत् ।